I don't think it is possible to "have it both ways".
I advocate for local currency and if the currency in employ is river rocks, than that is fine by me.
Just depends on where you live I reckon, but local currency is a big part of the solution for a better future. On that I hope we can agree and eff the central bankers.
There is a lot of "over-simplification" in this article I think. Some of it seems biased - if not suggestive.
I ain't no expert on fiscal banking matters, but I'm no fan of central bankers - in fact quite the opposite. Basically, I'm fedup with bankers in general.
Jackson was correct to dismiss the 2nd Bank I think, but in 1913 the central banking cartel got their revenge I reckon when they pulled a slick one in the waning days of the Congressional session...after they had their train ride and spent some time of the coast of Georgia in Jeckyl Island as I'm sure most readers here are already familiar with.
Stablecoin sounds like the worst possible option. It is like having one foot on the bank (dollar) and the other on the boat (crypto) when the boat is not securely moored to the bank. It is bound to fail as, whatever you think about crypto, it negates crypto's main advantage that it is totally independent of FIAT money.
Great banking and dollar history that we could all learn from. Also like the crypto world being explained in common terms that were understandable.
The excessive death rate is curious. First comes the open borders around the Western world to third world immigration. Then comes the vaccine and the excessive deaths. The immigrants are not forced to get the vaccines. The corporate and government controlled dismisses the replacement theory as a conspiracy theory..........
I don't think it is possible to "have it both ways".
I advocate for local currency and if the currency in employ is river rocks, than that is fine by me.
Just depends on where you live I reckon, but local currency is a big part of the solution for a better future. On that I hope we can agree and eff the central bankers.
There is a lot of "over-simplification" in this article I think. Some of it seems biased - if not suggestive.
I ain't no expert on fiscal banking matters, but I'm no fan of central bankers - in fact quite the opposite. Basically, I'm fedup with bankers in general.
Jackson was correct to dismiss the 2nd Bank I think, but in 1913 the central banking cartel got their revenge I reckon when they pulled a slick one in the waning days of the Congressional session...after they had their train ride and spent some time of the coast of Georgia in Jeckyl Island as I'm sure most readers here are already familiar with.
Here's something for BOOM to think about: https://www.goldback.com/
Hey P&S - I'm fixing to go over to Boom's place and raise some hell....
do you want to know why?
First ingredient to having influence in the minds of others it to engage with your readers and Boom has not done that.
So, I think I'll go over and say that direct - what you think?
Stablecoin sounds like the worst possible option. It is like having one foot on the bank (dollar) and the other on the boat (crypto) when the boat is not securely moored to the bank. It is bound to fail as, whatever you think about crypto, it negates crypto's main advantage that it is totally independent of FIAT money.
Great banking and dollar history that we could all learn from. Also like the crypto world being explained in common terms that were understandable.
The excessive death rate is curious. First comes the open borders around the Western world to third world immigration. Then comes the vaccine and the excessive deaths. The immigrants are not forced to get the vaccines. The corporate and government controlled dismisses the replacement theory as a conspiracy theory..........