Are you honestly trying to argue that all wars are not "banker's wars" - who is it that you serve P&S cause this argument rings hollow - present time and past to be honest.
So seriously - are you trying to "absolve" the bankers - and by the way - the debt they own - I'm debt free - it ain't my debt - is it yours?
So, seriously - I sure hope Boomy hasn't got you under a spell - cause the bankers are complicit today - and we may be peasants, but we ain't stupid and we know - for one living in South Africa - seems this would be self-evident.
A response would be appreciated, but either way I have ambitions, and I don't trust the bankers a whit - and if I can - I'll cast them off - I got no debt - they got nothing on me - the debt they own is theirs and theirs alone.
NOW, NOW my hearties. Let's get our thoughts in order and not run away with instant emotional reactions and implied horror of the Banksters. First, I am in discussion (polite) with BOOM about Bankers' Wars and I shall be writing a response soon.
The Banksters are certainly in the Devil's house, but it seems that they are enablers rather than the instigators, from what BOOM has explained to me. Our discussions will continue this coming week. No conclusions have been drawn yet as research is ongoing.
It does seem that there are some contradictory statements in AP's post ie:
1) THE CONCLUSION – REVEALED BY HISTORY. In economies that use “sound money” policies, military adventurism becomes inevitable. Warfare becomes the quickest and most certain way to expand the supply of goods and services, the store of gold (to expand the money supply), and the available labour force.
2) ALL WARS ARE NOT BANKERS WARS. The mantra “All Wars Are Bankers Wars” is often repeated without hesitation and careful thought.
Maybe WWI & WWII were not Banksters' wars but it seems, to me, that all wars since have been Banksters' wars.
I think there might be some "valdity" in saying bankers didn't cause Ghengis Khan and the Golden Horde of mongels to literally kill every citizen in the city if they refused to be subsumed, but in current times - well - let me just share this link:
I think that cuts to the "chase" of it - the bankers think they are gods and they think they control the devil as well - oh how wrong the bankers are...
Many thanks Ken. yes, I noted that BOOM was talking historically, but now I do think that the Banksters are more instigators that BOOM admits. Our discussions will continue durng the coming week and my post Part 2 on March 30 should help clarify matters for my dedicated readers, at least.
NOW, NOW my hearties. Let's get our thoughts in order and not run away with instant emotional reactions and implied horror of the Banksters. First, I am in discussion (polite) with BOOM about Bankers' Wars and I shall be wrting a response soon.
The Banksters are certainly in the Devil's house, but it seems that they are enablers rather than the instigators, from what BOOM has explained to me. Our discussions will continue this coming week. No conclusions have been drawn yet as research is ongoing.
Are you honestly trying to argue that all wars are not "banker's wars" - who is it that you serve P&S cause this argument rings hollow - present time and past to be honest.
So seriously - are you trying to "absolve" the bankers - and by the way - the debt they own - I'm debt free - it ain't my debt - is it yours?
So, seriously - I sure hope Boomy hasn't got you under a spell - cause the bankers are complicit today - and we may be peasants, but we ain't stupid and we know - for one living in South Africa - seems this would be self-evident.
A response would be appreciated, but either way I have ambitions, and I don't trust the bankers a whit - and if I can - I'll cast them off - I got no debt - they got nothing on me - the debt they own is theirs and theirs alone.
NOW, NOW my hearties. Let's get our thoughts in order and not run away with instant emotional reactions and implied horror of the Banksters. First, I am in discussion (polite) with BOOM about Bankers' Wars and I shall be writing a response soon.
The Banksters are certainly in the Devil's house, but it seems that they are enablers rather than the instigators, from what BOOM has explained to me. Our discussions will continue this coming week. No conclusions have been drawn yet as research is ongoing.
Stand by for more to follow.
Blessings
AP
It does seem that there are some contradictory statements in AP's post ie:
1) THE CONCLUSION – REVEALED BY HISTORY. In economies that use “sound money” policies, military adventurism becomes inevitable. Warfare becomes the quickest and most certain way to expand the supply of goods and services, the store of gold (to expand the money supply), and the available labour force.
2) ALL WARS ARE NOT BANKERS WARS. The mantra “All Wars Are Bankers Wars” is often repeated without hesitation and careful thought.
Maybe WWI & WWII were not Banksters' wars but it seems, to me, that all wars since have been Banksters' wars.
Thanks Greg, BOOM has asked me not to edit his Editorials, so I respect his request and have added my notes plainly marked.
We are continuing our discussions...more to come.
Blessings
AP
I think there might be some "valdity" in saying bankers didn't cause Ghengis Khan and the Golden Horde of mongels to literally kill every citizen in the city if they refused to be subsumed, but in current times - well - let me just share this link:
https://gallowshumormag.substack.com/p/jacob-rothschild-traps-satan-in-insurmountable
I think that cuts to the "chase" of it - the bankers think they are gods and they think they control the devil as well - oh how wrong the bankers are...
Many thanks Ken. yes, I noted that BOOM was talking historically, but now I do think that the Banksters are more instigators that BOOM admits. Our discussions will continue durng the coming week and my post Part 2 on March 30 should help clarify matters for my dedicated readers, at least.
Ha, so true. The thought of Satan drinking Bud Lite by choice, when he could drink a real beer, is not very likely! :)
NOW, NOW my hearties. Let's get our thoughts in order and not run away with instant emotional reactions and implied horror of the Banksters. First, I am in discussion (polite) with BOOM about Bankers' Wars and I shall be wrting a response soon.
The Banksters are certainly in the Devil's house, but it seems that they are enablers rather than the instigators, from what BOOM has explained to me. Our discussions will continue this coming week. No conclusions have been drawn yet as research is ongoing.
Stand by for more to follow.
Blessings
AP