Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sunface Jack's avatar

Thanks Austrian Peter from another South African who still lives in South Africa and is part of the targeted minority.

The DA and the ANC have been in bed with each other for years. They are both funded buy multi billionaire partners like Rupert, Oppenheimers and have friends like Patrice Motsepe. Con Artist Steenhuizen who has friends like Zille and Tony Leon and Frederick van Zyl Slabbert (PFP) Progressive Federal Party which became the DA who were funded by George Soros.

Remember that Helen Zille was friends with, Club Of Rome's Mamphela Ramphele and a Carnegie Foundation medalist. Don't forget that Neil de Beer is a de Beers (diamonds) grandson and an Ex spy for MK. If you don't know Ramaphosa and Thuli Madonsela are CIA plants as is Zondo who were all funded by the Ford foundation or who were affiliated with it.

One simply has to realise that the voting system here is rigged and is nothing more than an elective dictatorship run under the auspices of the IEC. Of course this country is not runs democratically as is assumed by many. The last 2024 General election exposed this unpalatable fact.

There were just over 27.6 million registered voters this year, of whom 16.2 million actually voted. – a turnout of 58.6 per cent according to the IEC. But that is misleading.

That over 11 million people took the trouble to register, but then did not exercise their right to vote, is bad enough. That means only 9.95 million voted and not all agreed in any event.

But when one considers that the eligible voting population (citizens over 18 years of age) is in the region of 38 million, the true proportion of adult South Africans who voted is only about 42 per cent. This means, in turn, that the largest party can claim the definite support of just 17 per cent of adult citizens, and the official opposition a paltry 9.25 per cent.

That means 9.95 million voted and not all agreed and is far below the 19.37 million potential votes to get 51% simple majority is it not?

Another way of putting it is that 38-9.95=28 million did not agree to the corrupted system.

So now we have a GNU - They the "Colluding Parties) all agreed to whatever the colluding "Parties" majority agree too. The opinion of the majority of the citizens does not count in any event, because of the way because of the way others voted!!

If one considers that eligible voters over the age of 18 were 38 million and of that 9.98 million voted to surrender consent means over 28 million have lost their right to oppose parliament, some stupidly but at least 17 million have had all their rights stolen by 11 million who fell for the trick of the Parliamentary majority being Parliamentary Sovereignty.

I explain it like this:

Once you decide to register as a political party in the current system. you commit yourself to a system where you and your "Party" have no choice other than to play their corrupt game of accepting the complete manifesto of the fake majority party. And by agreeing to this condition of participation as a political party, you force this condition on your supporters if they have registered as voters. Your supporters and you are being tricked. This is the parliamentary elective dictatorship that we have in South Africa at this junction.

You need to take cognisance that they are also empowered to amend this manifesto after the fact and there is nothing you can do about it because you consented to play by the IEC rules of the game.

Look who Ramaphosa put in place in the IEC. President Cyril Ramaphosa has appointed Janet Love as a commissioner of the Electoral Commission of SA (IEC). Now consider that The Legal Resources Trust which Janet Love was a Trustee of received US$ 8.3 MILLION from the Ford Foundation alone. Her background connects her too Brigalia Bam who served on the IEC and also on Board of Smartmatic a Company which has direct links to Lord Mark Mulloch Brown a friend of George Soros.

The voter is tricked into transferring consent regarding the entire manifesto of the winning party, thereby handing over total control to government not only in all aspects of the manifesto but also any other matter arising thereafter outside the manifesto. e.g. Covid19 lockdown, given that a “majority” provides total power to the winning party or their coalition.

It's a very dangerous precedent that was set in 1970. It is a massive issue that the Westminster system has been corrupted which people seem not to be able to realise. We were warned of this danger by Conservative Law Lord Hailsham, who said " It is the Parliamentary majority which has the potential for tyranny. The thing the Courts cannot protect you against is Parliament –the traditional protector of liberty – but Parliament is constantly making mistakes and could, in theory, become the most oppressive instrument in the world.” Why? Because they claim they are “democratically elected”, via the trick system described above.

That is my waffle for today. Cheers.

Expand full comment
Zarayna Pradyer's avatar

To Brics or not to Brics? That is the question.

With no real knowledge, let alone expertise, my instinct suggests aligning with the up-and-coming rather than the mature and declining.

I wish the UK would join the Brics - but they wouldn't have us.

Thanks, AP!

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts